Board post Clarification (another! :))

Any questions or discussions that you ONLY want to discuss with our staff or volunteers.
(Users: please do not reply to other users here.)
not a newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:12 pm
Age: 21
Awesomeness Quotient: I'm very passionate
Primary language: English
Preferred pronouns: She/her
Sexual identity and orientation: Straight
Location: California

Board post Clarification (another! :))

Unread post by lilaclady »

Hello again!
I was looking at a board comment made by Scarleteen that said pregnancy is NOT at risk if someone has:
"Had any actual or possible contact with pre-ejaculate but NOT during intercourse or direct (where people are naked, with no barriers) genital-to-genital contact."
Would "genital-to-genital" in this situation also be the same thing as intercourse with a condom on?
If, for example, the vulva had come into contact with pre-ejaculate (not during intercourse), but then safe intercourse DID occur after, would this statement still apply?
Sam W
scarleteen staff/volunteer
Posts: 7335
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:06 am
Age: 30
Awesomeness Quotient: I raise carnivorous plants
Primary language: english
Preferred pronouns: she/her
Sexual identity and orientation: queer
Location: Desert

Re: Board post Clarification (another! :))

Unread post by Sam W »

Hi lilaclady,

Genital to genital contact can include intercourse, but can also include grinding/humping without any barriers (no clothes, no condom) present.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic